MPS Minutes 20220120: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*Needs to be done at reasonable background levels, i.e., not with high dark current conditions from cavities. | *Needs to be done at reasonable background levels, i.e., not with high dark current conditions from cavities. | ||
*Should this go hand in hand with scan to verify coverage after a long shut down period? | *Should this go hand in hand with scan to verify coverage after a long shut down period? | ||
* | *Add flow chart | ||
==View screen / BLM interlocks for tuning== | ==View screen / BLM interlocks for tuning== | ||
Revision as of 00:07, 21 January 2022
BLM calibration
- AL preparing documents for requirements and specs
- Needs to be done at reasonable background levels, i.e., not with high dark current conditions from cavities.
- Should this go hand in hand with scan to verify coverage after a long shut down period?
- Add flow chart
View screen / BLM interlocks for tuning
- AL preparing documents for requirements and specs
- Is table and requirements enough? Or what should document look like?
FLASH/Darklight effect on MPS
- Email from Luca Egoriti last week: hoping to put beam on the FLASH station (the old EMBD dump) as soon as the e-linac is back in shape, and since the shielding envelope has changed we foresee higher dose rates in the ehall coming from the target/dump. Hence, we wanted to let you know since there might be some MPS work to be done to accommodate the modifications
- Recommissioning required for medium and high energy section.
2nd stage trip implementation
- Final status of implementation?
- What is left to do/needed?
Fibre
- Do we have PMT?
- What SiPMs are we looking to buy?
AOB
- Do all channels already have an HV OK? Do some still need to be added to watchdog?
- Making LICs for BL4N once cases are down a bit